In a world of freeware BitTorrent clients, there are two standout services: uTorrent and Vuze. Since there are hundreds of torrent clients available, many torrent users argue which software is better. To settle the debate of uTorrent vs. Vuze, we have put both the clients head-to-head. Our comparison focused on the features they offer, their overall performance, compatibility, and their reputation across different torrent communities.
On paper, both the software serve the same purpose – to share files among peers using BitTorrent protocol. They also offer neat features such as prioritizing torrent files, blocking different IP addresses, managing your bandwidth, and downloading directly from RSS feeds. However, uTorrent and Vuze have their pros and cons and need best torrent sites to support them. You can also view our similar guide on uTorrent or BitTorrent.
Note: We recommend you to read our guide on Transmission VPN too, if you wish to use this torrent client.
- Lightweight and small in size
- Non-Java based
- Freeware (premium package also available)
- Simple user interface
- Fast performance (low CPU & RAM usage)
- Compatible on Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android
- Backdoors can be built into the software
- Not open-source
- No third part plug-in support
- Less features compared to Vuze
Initially launched in 2005, uTorrent has over 100 million users at the time of writing this post. BitTorrent, Inc. owns the torrent client and this popularity has grown over the years. The software became an instant hit among torrent users due to its lightweight and superior performance. One of the reasons for this is that uTorrent is not Java based.
This means that uTorrent is small in size (approximately 2KB); it doesn’t have to access Java libraries, and has low reliance on CPU and RAM. Therefore, in uTorrent vs. Vuze, uTorrent takes the lead in terms of software performance. Also read about alternatives to uTorrent.
uTorrent is compatible on Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android devices. It also offers its premium services. You can subscribe an ad free version or get uTorrent Pro. The later offers additional benefits such as premium customer support, built-in antivirus and malware protection, and allows you to stream torrents instantly.
Also these are the torrent sites for mac which can be very safe for downloading when using a VPN.
However, one of the problems with uTorrent client is that the software is not open source. Many torrent users are quick to point out this aspect about the software as developers can implement anything in the background without users consent. They can introduce features such as copyright infringement reporting and Digital Rights Management (DRM) protection to highlight pirates. Likewise, uTorrent doesn’t offer any third party plug-in support.
- Open Source
- Freeware (offers a premium package)
- Supports third party plugins
- Easy to use interface
- Compatible on Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android
- Attractive additional features
- Backward compatibility
- Works on Java Runtime Environment
- High system resource consumption
- Can hamper system performance
Vuze, previously known as Azureus, is another popular BitTorrent client that allows P2P file sharing. It is a free and open-source software (FOSS) and is compatible on all major platforms including Windows, Mac, Linux, and Android. Few users are also using the older versions of Vuze (or Azureus as it was known previously), showing backward compatibility. It too commands massive user base from all over the world and is a worthy alternate to uTorrent.
However, when we put uTorrent vs Vuze side by side, Vuze has its own benefits. Since it is an open source software, Vuze is highly configurable and all the developments can be easily tracked. This prevents any kind of backdoors created into the software. Likewise, Vuze supports third party plugins and offers more features than uTorrent, such as video conversion and swarm discoveries. I would also recommend you to use Vuze VPN to secure torrenting.
The drawback of using Vuze is that it is highly dependent on system resources. This is because Vuze works on Java Runtime Environment (JRE), hence it could slow down your system. Java-based software tend to consume high amounts of RAM and CPU, as they have to access Java libraries. Therefore, if you have a system that can’t handle heavy software, it is better to use uTorrent instead.
That said, to curb the issue of software performance, Vuze has introduced a lightweight version called Leap. It is also available for free and doesn’t uses massive amounts of resources as compared to Vuze. Another advantage of Leap is that it has no ads, which is apparent on Vuze. You can also view our guide of how to use Vuze anonymously.
uTorrent vs. Vuze Speed Tests
We tested both the software for their overall performances. However, for Vuze vs. uTorrent speed tests, the results were variable. For instance, our initial speed tests showed that Vuze was faster, but the second test showed that uTorrent offered slightly better torrent download and upload speeds. Therefore, nothing conclusive can be drawn from the speeds test results.
In addition, we explored different communities of both the software to find a definitive answer. However, the debate between uTorrent vs. Vuze over speeds test are inconsistent among torrent users. Some advocates of Vuze prefer the software to uTorrent. On the contrary, some users favor uTorrent to Vuze because of the lightweight software, suggesting that uTorrent offers better speeds.
uTorrent vs. Vuze for Mac
When we speak of Mac devices, you can use either BitTorrent client. The battle between uTorrent vs. Vuze for Mac is a close one. Both the software offer reliable performance on Mac, therefore, it is hard to pick one over the other. Some users prefer Vuze because of its additional features compared to uTorrent, while others want maximum system performance so they fancy uTorrent.
To conclude our uTorrent vs. Vuze debate, both the software offer their own benefits and drawbacks. uTorrent is lightweight and doesn’t hamper your systems performance. Vuze offers more additional features that overshadows uTorrent, but is heavy and consumes considerable RAM and CPU.
On the other hand, Vuze is open source and supports third party plugins. This makes Vuze highly customizable and makes it secure from backdoors. Therefore, if you were to choose between the two, we would advise that you select uTorrent if you want to share files and don’t want your system to become sluggish. If you have a beast of a system and want additional features, then go with Vuze.
We expect you would have liked our uTorrent vs. Vuze comparison guide. After exploring the guide, you can find the differences between uTorrent vs. BitTorrent, qBitTorrent vs. Vuze, and so on.
You can add your feedback in the comments section below about your experience.